On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 09:38:14AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: > Some processes don't work well together, and systemd can maintain a > database of such processes, perhaps in Postgres, to prevent one of > those processes from running if the other is already running, unless > the processes themselves tell systemd they're aware of the danger and > it's OK. > > Systemd's database should include uuid's for specific programs known to > be safe, and should not start others, unless A) The program emits a > uuid to systemd upon being asked to run, and B) that uuid has been put > in the database either by the distribution or by the system > administrator. Before running, systemd will check the md5sum of the > executable to make sure it matches the uuid. Because this might be a > hardship during development, the systemd database will have a column > called "lax", which, if true, allows the program to run as long as the > program submits the proper password. > > I'm conceptually not a fan of systemd, but you have to admit it opens > up many opportunities.
You mean systemd should shoulder some of the kernel's work? LOL Please please, Mr Poettering, I mean it as a joke, honest! -- "If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing." --- Malcolm X -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140815141248.GA19964@tal