On 6/13/16, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: > Le sextidi 26 prairial, an CCXXIV, Tanstaafl a écrit : >> This is why Reply-To-List is the way to reply when engaged in a mailing >> list. >> >> If your client doesn't have this, then maybe it is time to consider >> changing. > > I am not sure what you are aiming at. If "Reply-To-List" is supposed to be > a > message header, as the typography, then you can observe that it is not > present in most of the mails on this mailing-list. > > If you are referring to a MUA command, then first let me remind you that > MUA > commands are not standardized
Am coming into this whole conversation from the backend side (last in, first out :) ). This, a standardized reply-to-list feature, sounds like a great advocacy point to be followed up on.... Perhaps within each of the more prominent "MUA" developer forums, at least? It's a great +1 selling point for email [clients/packages] that wish to expand their user base, at least or perhaps more especially, among the more technically savvy. Just thinking out loud... :) Cindy :) -- Cindy-Sue Causey Talking Rock, Pickens County, Georgia, USA * runs with plastic sporks *