On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:08:00 +1100, Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 08:47:37PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: >> > > It's impossible to enforce a "STFU about it" option. >> >> On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 11:51:49AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: >> > similarly, it's impossible to enforce a "Further Discussion" >> > option yet it's there on the ballot. >> >> So? >> >> Maybe it would be clearer if you prefixed that with "Allow for". >> Even more if you consider that this is a part of a decision making >> process. >> >> Futher Discussion allows for further discussion before any binding >> decisions are made. >> >> Does it make sense to talk about allowing people to shut up? Does >> it make more sense to talk about allowing people to shut up before >> decisions are made? > are you fucking stupid? is everyone in debian fucking stupid? do > you all have to squabble over the tiniest most pedantically trivial > things? for fuck's sake, get a grip - argue all you like over REAL > things, pick the shit out of REAL holes in people's arguments, but > don't fucking waste time over stupid bullshit like this. I could say the same about your original nit pick about the ballot. > the point, for those of you to stupid to work it out for yourselves > even after being told TWICE what it is, is that it makes a very nice > suggestion that it would be good if people just shut the fuck up > about this subject. that's it. that's all. nothing else. no more > can be read into it. and, surprisingly, it will not be enforced by > debian storm-troopers or black helicopters. Could you please take your own advice? > i really don't know how much simpler i can put it than that. if > even that is beyond you, then there is no point in trying again. >> > and just in case you miss the point of this message: some of us >> > are sick to death of this topic. >> >> So what? > it would be nice if everyone would just shut the fuck up about it. > that's "so what". And you think introducing posts in the thread with vituperative language is likely to be conducive to having people shut up? My. > are you sane? you seem to make a habit of going off on weird > non-sequitir tangents that appear to have no relationship to reality > or to anything that has gone before. Asking for a shut up about is option on all ballots is not going off on a tangent? manoj -- Fascinating, a totally parochial attitude. Spock, "Metamorphosis", stardate 3219.8 Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/> 1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C