On 19 May 2004 at 16:59, Darin Cox wrote:

> Yes, but only for Pro licenses and custom filtering.  Using weighting
> groups could allow Standard licenses to do this, as well as being much
> faster than text processing.
> 
> Darin.
Gotcha. Did not know of the standard ver limits

-Nick

> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Nick Hayer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 4:48 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
> Feature request: COMBO tests
> 
> 
> Hi Darin -
> 
> On 19 May 2004 at 15:10, Darin Cox wrote:
> 
> > I would like to be able to group tests together and give a weight to
> > the group rather than the individual tests. That way if one or
> > multiple tests fail, only one weight is added.
> The answer is:
> 
> > I realize others have found a workaround for the multiple DUL issue
> > by  using custom filters
> [In the archives you will find exactly this example provided by Matt]
> 
> This works well - a feature request for NOTCONTAINS has been made and
> will improve the method
> 
> -Nick Hayer
> 
> 
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
> (http://www.declude.com)]
> 
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
> 
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
> (http://www.declude.com)]
> 
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
> 


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to