[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15848534#comment-15848534
 ] 

Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-6445:
-------------------------------------------

I cannot recall what I said about setNull(), and I don't think anything is 
needed there. As to getObject(), even if this conversion is only mentioned in 
the conversion tables for setObject(), [the spec for 
getObject()|http://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/sql/ResultSet.html#getObject-int-java.lang.Class-]
 says:

"At a minimum, an implementation must support the conversions defined in 
Appendix B, Table B-3 and conversion of appropriate user defined SQL types to a 
Java type which implements SQLData, or Struct. Additional conversions may be 
supported and are vendor defined."

So it sounds like we're free to add more conversions, and I think these ones 
make sense.

> JDBC 4.2: Add support for new date and time classes
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-6445
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6445
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: JDBC
>    Affects Versions: 10.10.1.1
>            Reporter: Knut Anders Hatlen
>         Attachments: Derby-6445.html, Derby-6445.html
>
>
> JDBC 4.2 added type mappings for new date and time classes found in Java 8. 
> Derby should support these new mappings.
> This would at least affect Derby's implementation of the various getObject(), 
> setObject() and setNull() methods in ResultSet, PreparedStatement and 
> CallableStatement.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to