Le lundi 16 janvier 2006 à 21:07 +0100, Thomas Vander Stichele a écrit : > Hi, > > > > > > > Of those 80 most are from the 0.8 days. And they illustrate the problem > > > with nobody working on the 0.8 stuff anymore. > > > > So, can we hope that some of you (Tim?) > > Let's not shovel too much dirt on Tim yet :) We're already passing him > all of the hot potatoes. Tim's focusing on the 0.10 bits.
I'm sad: you gave the impression that Tim was a machine who could do everything we want him to do ;-) > > will triage those bugs soon? > > Because for me, it doesn't illustrate the problem that nobody's working > > on 0.8 but it does illustrate that nobody's triaging totem-gstreamer > > bugs. > > They could use basic triaging in the sense that someone should go > through them and see what applies to the 0.10 version. I think that > you'd find most GStreamer bug triagers to mark them as obsolete if they > apply only to the 0.8 backend though, and I don't know if that's what > you want in this case. I don't think marking them as obsolete is okay right now. I'd use the status whiteboard so we can easily know they're only happening with the 0.8 backend. (Or maybe create a gstreamer0.8 component, but this is ugly). Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list