On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 09:14 +0000, Ross Gardler wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Author: thorsten > > Date: Sun Jan 14 12:48:45 2007 > > New Revision: 496145 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=496145 > > Log: > > Allowing plugins to provide tiles. > > I'm assuming this is tiles in Dispatcher speak not tiles as in Apache > Tiles. If this is so I think we ought to find a different name for it in > Dispatcher, I can already "hear" the confused user questions as a result > of a Google search.
Would be templates better? They are "sub-structurer" to easier provide grouped contracts (functionality) and hooks (design) on a plugin/project/theme base. I will call it x till we find a better name for tiles. <jx:import uri=cocoon://prepare.tiles.solrbar/> would become <jx:import uri=cocoon://prepare.x.solrbar/> I further suggest to get them out of the html contract dir. tree resources/themes/common/html/ resources/themes/common/html/ |-- solr-actionbar.ft |-- solr-add.ft |-- solr-search.ft `-- solrbar.vt.xml They do not belong in there. If you look in the core themes you can find common-fo.vt.xml in the html dir of the common theme. This x does not provide a group of html but fo contracts! IMO they should be stored in resources/themes/common/x and stripped from ".vt" (does not makes sense anymore - vt stands for view tiles). tree resources/themes/common/x resources/themes/common/x `-- solrbar.xml wdyt? Please we need some suggestions to replace x with better naming. salu2 -- thorsten "Together we stand, divided we fall!" Hey you (Pink Floyd)
