Thorsten Scherler wrote: > Ross Gardler wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Author: thorsten > > > Date: Sun Jan 14 12:48:45 2007 > > > New Revision: 496145 > > > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=496145 > > > Log: > > > Allowing plugins to provide tiles. > > > > I'm assuming this is tiles in Dispatcher speak not tiles as in Apache > > Tiles. If this is so I think we ought to find a different name for it in > > Dispatcher, I can already "hear" the confused user questions as a result > > of a Google search. > > Would be templates better? > > They are "sub-structurer" to easier provide grouped contracts > (functionality) and hooks (design) on a plugin/project/theme base.
"Templates" is an over-used term. Would the term "groups" be suitable. -David > I will call it x till we find a better name for tiles. > > <jx:import uri=cocoon://prepare.tiles.solrbar/> > would become > <jx:import uri=cocoon://prepare.x.solrbar/> > > I further suggest to get them out of the html contract dir. > > tree resources/themes/common/html/ > resources/themes/common/html/ > |-- solr-actionbar.ft > |-- solr-add.ft > |-- solr-search.ft > `-- solrbar.vt.xml > > They do not belong in there. If you look in the core themes you can find > common-fo.vt.xml in the html dir of the common theme. This x does not > provide a group of html but fo contracts! > > IMO they should be stored in resources/themes/common/x and stripped from > ".vt" (does not makes sense anymore - vt stands for view tiles). > > tree resources/themes/common/x > resources/themes/common/x > `-- solrbar.xml > > wdyt? > > Please we need some suggestions to replace x with better naming. > > salu2 > -- > thorsten
