-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jacek Laskowski wrote: > > Let's take this as an example. As we haven't discussed it yet, it > seems to me that such a change requires 3x+1 from PMC members. So, > only when this vote (it should possibly be a separate vote with > 72-hour vote period to bring more attention) passes committers who are > not PMC members have their +1 binding. Am I correct?
No. Only PMC votes are binding. There is only an issue here because the PMC != committers. I think the most desirable solution is PMC === committers, but other people on the PMC disagree. - -- #ken P-|} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBRJVk7prNPMCpn3XdAQIn3gQAlrUGNSNUZomw99D6efCrF2vGysX7lFVf OXGXMBcygerrUCoT7ldp0nylh18FDDiiYWoTzzAxsTWjYodwjUGVrbTX6Q/3o+hF Q+liFMYqo5p46kI2DZdbz8T//s/MsztCt9JC/zmAu5oYfQZtOpRe/t/aaJcie6Dy gCuDNpG/X4Y= =SBLj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
