It might appear redundant but "Struts 1" is the name rather than version number and hopefully what people will get used to distinguish between the two flavours on offer. Its no different than what Sun did when they introduced Java 2 and who knows where out version numbers are going to go in the two parts. That in itself is good enouh reason to leave it IMO - but also I'm against overriding the defaults of the build unless absolutely necessary - that way if things change in the future theres less places to remember. If we'd done this in the previous year we would have had to correct it 3 or 4 times!
Niall On 7/2/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wendy, thanks. I understand the proposal. Version 1 is already in 1.3.5; so it doesn't need to be said everytime; the version number is enough to indicate its version 1. Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/2/06, Paul Benedict wrote: > Does anyone else find this kind of title redudant? > Struts 1 - Core 1.3.5-SNAPSHOT API > We can specify it in the pom. I recommend: > Struts Core 1.3.5-SNAPSHOT API This change results from Don's proposal thread [1] about renaming Struts Action -> Struts, in which I believe the consensus was to go with 'Struts 1' and 'Struts 2'. [1] http://www.nabble.com/-PROPOSAL--Rename-Struts-Action-as-Struts-tf1864462.html -- Wendy
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
