The NIST date and EV date are the dates when they should no longer be used, not 'no longer admitted for use', unless I'm completely misreading the table on page 66 of the NIST SP800-57.
I'm all for much more immediate cessation of adding new roots into the browser of 1024 bits, simply because as an operational matter it takes over a year and a half for requests to be evaluated anyway. -Kyle H On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 2:08 AM, Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kyle Hamilton wrote: >> There has been evidence of Microsoft, at the least, following this >> group and acting on good ideas that started here. > > We do talk to each other, you know :-) > >> January 1 2009 particularly because it provides slightly less than 2 >> quarters of notice. > > Indeed. Which doesn't sound like very much to me. Picking 31st December > 2010 would have the advantage of matching both the NIST date and the EV > date. > > Gerv > > _______________________________________________ > dev-tech-crypto mailing list > dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto > _______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
