Kyle Hamilton wrote: > There has been evidence of Microsoft, at the least, following this > group and acting on good ideas that started here.
We do talk to each other, you know :-) > January 1 2009 particularly because it provides slightly less than 2 > quarters of notice. Indeed. Which doesn't sound like very much to me. Picking 31st December 2010 would have the advantage of matching both the NIST date and the EV date. Gerv _______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
