Rob Stradling: > On Wednesday 16 July 2008 15:08:15 Frank Hecker wrote: >> ... >> We are doing what we can. However by design we do not simply >> "rubber-stamp" CA requests. We have an official policy which was >> developed through a process of community consultation, and we follow a >> similar process of community discussion when considering CAs. We do have >> more people now working on CA-related tasks (unlike previously when I >> was the only person, and could do it only part-time). However the >> process will never be quick IMO. > > Frank, is there any reason why you can't have multiple candidate CAs having > their "public discussion periods" simultaneously? > > Having watched this list for a number of months, I think I'm right in saying > that you're only allowing one at a time...in which case, how is having "more > people now working on CA-related tasks" actually improving your overall > throughput? >
I think one CA in public discussion per time just fine, however the overall throughput could be accelerated. That would allow for a new CA every two weeks or so. -- Regards Signer: Eddy Nigg, StartCom Ltd. Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blog: https://blog.startcom.org _______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
