* Richard Barnes: > If there are any objections or comments on that proposal, please > raise them in this thread.
A lot of this has already been hashed out on the IETF TLS WG mailing list, with a slightly different perspective. Why is disabling SSL 3.0 acceptable, but getting rid of the broken fallback which will keep endangering users for a long time to come is not? -- dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
