On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 06:13 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> >> -0 and +1 on doing it after 1.6. I think this is a majority vote, >> isn't it? > > Your -0 isn't a veto, in any case.
I know, and I wouldn't want it to be one. > Do you have some reservations? Is it just a timing issue? Mainly a timing issue, yes. I realize that the split-up optional.jar thing is almost crying for help from URLClassLoader, so I almost buy that a switch now is necessary. It just feels (to me) better to do such a move completely than doing it in an incosistent manner. Stefan
