On 1/23/06, Andreas Magnusson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Garrett Rooney wrote: > > > > I'm not positive, not being an especially fluent win32 developer, but > > I think this seems reasonable... Would this patch be a replacement > > for the backport you previously identified as avoiding the problem, or > > is it in addition to it? > > > > -garrett > > > > Ah, no this patch is an addition to that backport, and I now realize > that this patch ought to be nominated for backport if the intended > behavior is to mimmick the *nix behavior of apr_stat(,,APR_FINFO_PROT,) > > /Andreas >
I lost track of where this issue is at...have these fixes been applied so that on Win32 Subversion should work with the latest apr? DJ
