Bojan Smojver wrote:
Quoting Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
There's no reason for compat macros, this code has not been released
in any version of APR, so compat is not an issue.
I was referring to renaming all DBD functions actually (including the
new ones), so that they follow the naming proper convention (ie.
lib_object_subobject_verb). Or is that too much to change at once?
Right - I wasn't being critical of your specific new fn, but just a general
observation. In the past, we created renames_proposed to collect a list for
review and comment before committing the changes; if you agree with the
syntax _get _set etc, then let's start that list again.
Where you took the naming from - made your choice very consistent. I was
commenting on the consistency of the libraries as a whole :)
Bill
