On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:00:11PM +0100, Nick Kew wrote: > On Fri, 30 May 2008 17:47:23 +1000 > Bojan Smojver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 01:50 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > > > > So if it's possible with the postgresql to mute the stdout > > > information, we really need to do so. > > > > I'm not convinced of the usefulness of this, but here is the patch > > nevertheless. > > > Wouldn't a better patch be to save the message internally so that > a subsequent dbd_pgsql_error picks it up? > > Not exactly critical - just a thought.
Maybe a way to allow the user to get access to the messages too? I did notice that when I do this on startup, set client_min_messages = 'WARNING'; that the messages stop. Perhaps this is a good enough work around? I'm not sure, I don't know entirely the philosophy of the apr group. Bob Rossi
