On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 12:00 +0100, Nick Kew wrote: > Wouldn't a better patch be to save the message internally so that > a subsequent dbd_pgsql_error picks it up?
AFAICT, this doesn't affect errors, just warnings and notices: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/libpq-notice-processing.html Errors can be gotten still with PQerrorMessage(), which is what dbd_pgsql_error() does. Do we really want to start mixing these up? Bob, Does the patch actually stop that output that you mentioned or not? -- Bojan
