On Feb 4, 2010, at 12:46 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > I have libtool 1.5.26 on Linux (seems to be same version as used for > 1.3.9) but I see this difference in my test roll of 1.3.9:
libtool.m4 is copied in when you run libtoolize as called by buildconf. A
release tarball has whatever version the RM pulled in.
S.
> diff -ru opensource/apr-1.3.9/build/libtool.m4 apr-1.3.9/build/libtool.m4
> --- opensource/apr-1.3.9/build/libtool.m4 2009-09-21
> 17:59:31.000000000 -0400
> +++ apr-1.3.9/build/libtool.m4 2010-02-04 15:36:25.000000000 -0500
> @@ -6042,7 +6042,25 @@
> ;;
>
> darwin* | rhapsody*)
> - _LT_AC_TAGVAR(allow_undefined_flag, $1)="$_lt_dar_allow_undefined"
> + case $host_os in
> + rhapsody* | darwin1.[[012]])
> + _LT_AC_TAGVAR(allow_undefined_flag, $1)='${wl}-undefined
> ${wl}suppress'
> + ;;
> + *) # Darwin 1.3 on
> + if test -z ${MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET} ; then
> + _LT_AC_TAGVAR(allow_undefined_flag,
> $1)='${wl}-flat_namespace ${wl}-undefined ${wl}suppress'
> + else
> + case ${MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET} in
> + 10.[[012]])
> + _LT_AC_TAGVAR(allow_undefined_flag,
> $1)='${wl}-flat_namespace ${wl}-undefined ${wl}suppress'
> + ;;
> + 10.*)
> + _LT_AC_TAGVAR(allow_undefined_flag,
> $1)='${wl}-undefined ${wl}dynamic_lookup'
> + ;;
> + esac
> + fi
> + ;;
> + esac
> _LT_AC_TAGVAR(archive_cmds_need_lc, $1)=no
> _LT_AC_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
> _LT_AC_TAGVAR(hardcode_automatic, $1)=yes
>
> Does anyone recognize that diff and know where it comes from? Or, can
> anybody confirm that the diff isn't important?
>
> (similar diff in the generated configure)
>
> Thanks!
>
>
--
san...@temme.net http://www.temme.net/sander/
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
