On 05.02.2010 00:36, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Sander Temme <san...@temme.net> wrote: >> On Feb 4, 2010, at 12:46 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> >>> I have libtool 1.5.26 on Linux (seems to be same version as used for >>> 1.3.9) but I see this difference in my test roll of 1.3.9: >> libtool.m4 is copied in when you run libtoolize as called by buildconf. A >> release tarball has whatever version the RM pulled in. > > Sure... In trying to duplicate the libtool version from the last > tarball (1.3.9) I don't get the same libtool.m4. I guess that libtool > was 1.5.26 + some patch that isn't reflected in the libtool version
Not sure how it was done when 1.3.8 was rolled but the general recommendation is to download the whole auto* libtool chain, compile it yourself and use it for rolling. This should avoid any vendor specific patches that are sometimes part of OS distributed versions of the above. Regards Rüdiger
