Use your local archiva as a mirror of central :-).
Start archiva.
In ~/.m2/settings.xml
<mirrors>
<mirror>
<name>archiva</name>
<mirrorOf>central</mirrorOf>
<id>archiva-mirror</id>
<url>http://localhost:9091/archiva/repository/internal/</url>
</mirror>
</mirrors>
and build a project using an empty repo: add -Dmaven.repo.local=path
to an empty repo
this will populate your archiva instance.
2012/3/1 Eric Barboni <barb...@irit.fr>:
> Just a question how to have some artifact inside the new UI to test?
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Olivier Lamy [mailto:ol...@apache.org]
> Envoyé : jeudi 1 mars 2012 12:47
> À : dev@archiva.apache.org
> Objet : Re: Random unit test fail during build
>
> 2012/3/1 Eric Barboni <barb...@irit.fr>:
>> Yep not so much failure.
> Cool :-)
> I have implemented some filtering on search. Have a look :-) Don't miss -U I
> have changed few things in redback too.
>
>>
>> I move from jdk7.0 to jdk7.3 but they are still random test failure.
>>
>> Is Jenkins able to build only one artifact for example
>> archiva-scheduler-repository (which fail random) and do a lots of
>> clean build to see if at least on fail :p ?
>> Something like checkout + 100 * mvn clean install
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De : Olivier Lamy [mailto:ol...@apache.org] Envoyé : mercredi 29
>> février 2012 18:26 À : dev@archiva.apache.org Objet : Re: Random unit
>> test fail during build
>>
>> 2012/2/29 Eric Barboni <barb...@irit.fr>:
>>> Well I think I found one more difficult to investigate in
>>> ArchivaRepositoryScanningTaskExecutor :p.
>>> I will take a look.
>> Weird you have so much unit failures.
>>>
>>> Is there a web site where "current svn trunk" reports (surefire,...)
>>> are generated ?
>> nope :-)
>> You have Jenkins which execute builds on various os/jdk here:
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/A-F/view/Archiva/ and not so much failures.
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Message d'origine-----
>>> De : Olivier Lamy [mailto:ol...@apache.org] Envoyé : mercredi 29
>>> février 2012 16:17 À : dev@archiva.apache.org Objet : Re: Random unit
>>> test fail during build
>>>
>>> 2012/2/29 Eric Barboni <barb...@irit.fr>:
>>>> Sorry for the too local patch but was not capable of doing that for
>>>> unknown reason. Unclear what the top repo is.
>>>> Seems to work in all/archiva will do that for next one.
>>>>
>>>> As I will have other test failing cause ordering I want to know if
>>>> issue
>>>> https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-1609 can be reopen a rename as
>>>> something more generic to store the "faulty" tests ?
>>>
>>> reopened.
>>>
>>>> I can open another issue otherwise.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Message d'origine-----
>>>> De : Eric Barboni [mailto:barb...@irit.fr] Envoyé : mercredi 29
>>>> février 2012 12:11 À : dev@archiva.apache.org Objet : RE: Random
>>>> unit test fail during build
>>>>
>>>> For the one of the test see issue
>>>> https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-1609
>>>>
>>>> -----Message d'origine-----
>>>> De : Olivier Lamy [mailto:ol...@apache.org] Envoyé : mardi 28
>>>> février
>>>> 2012
>>>> 19:23 À : dev@archiva.apache.org Objet : Re: Random unit test fail
>>>> during build
>>>>
>>>> 2012/2/28 Eric Barboni <barb...@irit.fr>:
>>>>> I have limited knowledge of surefire so not sure if I am right
>>>>> Seems to me that runOrder=alphabetical is only for class ordering
>>>>> and not for method ordering.
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.DefaultRunOrderCalcultator.java in
>>>>> surefire-api
>>>> correct !
>>>> So I'm puzzled with your issue. :-(
>>>>>
>>>>> I try to run new UI with modifying template to see if it works even
>>>>> with test unit not working.
>>>> Yup no problem you can still run the webapp
>>>>
>>>>> Seems I can try to propose the patch for browser part (in a close
>>> future).
>>>>> (will write an enhancement issue to keep trace)
>>>>
>>>> Good !!! and Thanks !
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Eric
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Message d'origine-----
>>>>> De : Olivier Lamy [mailto:ol...@apache.org] Envoyé : mardi 28
>>>>> février
>>>>> 2012 15:00 À : dev@archiva.apache.org Objet : Re: Random unit test
>>>>> fail during build
>>>>>
>>>>> 2012/2/28 Eric Barboni <barb...@irit.fr>:
>>>>>> I log some info during test on Archiva Base :: Repository
>>>>>> Interface Layer
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It seems that the two following tests are executed in random order.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> public void testGatherSnapshotVersionsA() public void
>>>>>> testGatherSnapshotVersionsAWithProxies()
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If testGatherSnapshotVersionsA before
>>>>>> testGatherSnapshotVersionsAWithProxies
>>>>>> Test run OK
>>>>>> But testGatherSnapshotVersionsAWithProxies before
>>>>>> testGatherSnapshotVersionsA leads to
>>>>>> 1.0-alpha-11-20070315.033030-10 present on the test repository and
>> messing the test.
>>>>> weird as surefire is configured to runOrder=alphabetical
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- On the UI (Long and not easy to explain only by text) Cannot
>>>>>> yet help in coding. Not fluent in the framework yet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I like the idea about separate browsing vs search with query
>>>>>>>>parameters
>>>>>> (I'm currently working on the search I hope to have finish this
>>>>>> week)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>BTW the autocomplete/filtering on browsing looks to be a nice
>>>>>>>>idea
>>>>>> (something like http://www.screencast.com/t/01FIwaVTr ? ) (I have
>>>>>> just committed that) Looks cool
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some other idea to have in the new UI
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --> browser with more complete list (list of full path group +
>>>>>> --> artifact +
>>>>>> version) with filtering according to current search quick search.
>>>>>> With nice color cycle to make reading reading easy.
>>>>>> --> possibility remove in browser (according to user permission,
>>>>>> and maybe
>>>>>> upload) less error in filling the delete or upload form. (because
>>>>>> input can be pre filled)
>>>>>
>>>>> yup agree on the delete too :-) (but with selection on which
>>>>> repository(ies) to delete)
>>>>>
>>>>>> ..... | repository
>>>>>> | Manage
>>>>>>
>>>>>> / ant / ant / 1.6.5 | internal
>>>>>> | remove
>>>>>> / ant / ant / 1.6 | internal
>>>>>> | remove
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --> right side view (1/2 to 1/3 % of width of page) for details
>>>>>> info with tab like is now when you got the artifact.
>>>>>
>>>>> patch welcome :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alternative menu item center on artifact / repo / report / user /
>>>>>> system vs find / manage / administration Somehow restricted menu
>>>>>> should be not displayed or in different color
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Artifacts (public with exception)
>>>>>> Browse
>>>>>> Search
>>>>>> Upload (restricted)
>>>>>> Delete (restricted)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Repository (restricted)
>>>>>> Repository Group
>>>>>> Repository
>>>>>> Proxy connectors
>>>>>> Network Proxies
>>>>>> Legacy Support
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Reports (public with exception)
>>>>>> Report
>>>>>> Audit Log (restricted)
>>>>>> System Status (restricted)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> System (restricted)
>>>>>> Customize appearance
>>>>>> Network configuration
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> //
>>>>>> Users (restricted) seems to be done in top tool bar
>>>>>> Management
>>>>>> Roles
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Message d'origine-----
>>>>>> De : Olivier Lamy [mailto:ol...@apache.org] Envoyé : lundi 27
>>>>>> février
>>>>>> 2012 22:24 À : dev@archiva.apache.org Objet : Re: Random unit test
>>>>>> fail during build
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2012/2/27 Eric Barboni <barb...@irit.fr>:
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>> Thanks for your answer
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To cite a new world famous French actor ("P...., genial, mercy")
>>>>>> :-)
>>>>>>> It works archiva get started on my localhost with new UI.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The tomcat7 seems working good but not sure what is doing :p.
>>>>>>> I like the permanent banner on top.
>>>>>>> My 2 cents on current "Find menu item" in UI Work in Progress :
>>>>>>> Is it possible to merge search and browse page? If now using
>>>>>>> javascript it may be cool to have a dynamic filtering allowing
>>>>>>> incomplete
>>>>>> search.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If doing a clean / build on archiva folder I still have test
>>>>>>> failure (I am working on windows 7)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> no luck :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> with - Dsurefire.useFile=false and "clean and build" on archiva
>>>>>>>>> folder
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then Archiva Base :: Repository Interface Layer ........ FAILURE
>>>>>>> [12.329s]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> testGatherSnapshotVersionsA(org.apache.archiva.repository.metadata.
>>>>>>> M
>>>>>>> e
>>>>>>> t
>>>>>>> adataT
>>>>>>> oolsTest) Time elapsed: 0.022 sec <<< FAILURE!
>>>>>>> java.lang.AssertionError: Assert Snapshot Versions: length/size
>>>>>>> expected:<8> but was:<9>
>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91)
>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:645)
>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:126)
>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:470)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.apache.archiva.repository.metadata.MetadataToolsTest.assertSn
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> p
>>>>>>> s
>>>>>>> h
>>>>>>> o
>>>>>>> tVersi
>>>>>>> ons(MetadataToolsTest.java:372)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.apache.archiva.repository.metadata.MetadataToolsTest.testGath
>>>>>>> e
>>>>>>> r
>>>>>>> S
>>>>>>> n
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> pshotV
>>>>>>> ersionsA(MetadataToolsTest.java:76)
>>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
>>>>>>> Method)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.
>>>>>>> j
>>>>>>> ava:57
>>>>>>> )
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodA
>>>>>>> c
>>>>>>> c
>>>>>>> e
>>>>>>> s
>>>>>>> s
>>>>>>> orImpl
>>>>>>> .java:43)
>>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.
>>>>>>> java:44)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(Reflectiv
>>>>>>> e
>>>>>>> C
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> l
>>>>>>> l
>>>>>>> able.j
>>>>>>> ava:15)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(Framewo
>>>>>>> r
>>>>>>> k
>>>>>>> M
>>>>>>> e
>>>>>>> t
>>>>>>> hod.ja
>>>>>>> va:41)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(Invok
>>>>>>> e
>>>>>>> M
>>>>>>> e
>>>>>>> t
>>>>>>> h
>>>>>>> od.jav
>>>>>>> a:20)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.springframework.test.context.junit4.statements.RunBeforeTestM
>>>>>>> e
>>>>>>> t
>>>>>>> h
>>>>>>> o
>>>>>>> d
>>>>>>> Callba
>>>>>>> cks.evaluate(RunBeforeTestMethodCallbacks.java:74)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.springframework.test.context.junit4.statements.RunAfterTestMe
>>>>>>> t
>>>>>>> h
>>>>>>> o
>>>>>>> d
>>>>>>> C
>>>>>>> allbac
>>>>>>> ks.evaluate(RunAfterTestMethodCallbacks.java:83)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.junit.rules.TestWatchman$1.evaluate(TestWatchman.java:48)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.springframework.test.context.junit4.statements.SpringRepeat.e
>>>>>>> v
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> l
>>>>>>> u
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> te(Spr
>>>>>>> ingRepeat.java:72)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.springframework.test.context.junit4.SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.r
>>>>>>> u
>>>>>>> n
>>>>>>> C
>>>>>>> h
>>>>>>> i
>>>>>>> ld(Spr
>>>>>>> ingJUnit4ClassRunner.java:231)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4Clas
>>>>>>> s
>>>>>>> R
>>>>>>> u
>>>>>>> n
>>>>>>> n
>>>>>>> er.jav
>>>>>>> a:49)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:193)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:52)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:191)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:42)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:184)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.springframework.test.context.junit4.statements.RunBeforeTestC
>>>>>>> l
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> s
>>>>>>> s
>>>>>>> C
>>>>>>> allbac
>>>>>>> ks.evaluate(RunBeforeTestClassCallbacks.java:61)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.springframework.test.context.junit4.statements.RunAfterTestCl
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> s
>>>>>>> s
>>>>>>> C
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> llback
>>>>>>> s.evaluate(RunAfterTestClassCallbacks.java:71)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:236)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.springframework.test.context.junit4.SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.r
>>>>>>> u
>>>>>>> n
>>>>>>> (
>>>>>>> S
>>>>>>> p
>>>>>>> ringJU
>>>>>>> nit4ClassRunner.java:174)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:
>>>>>>> 236)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JU
>>>>>>> n
>>>>>>> i
>>>>>>> t
>>>>>>> 4
>>>>>>> P
>>>>>>> rovide
>>>>>>> r.java:134)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.
>>>>>>> java:1
>>>>>>> 13)
>>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
>>>>>>> Method)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.
>>>>>>> j
>>>>>>> ava:57
>>>>>>> )
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodA
>>>>>>> c
>>>>>>> c
>>>>>>> e
>>>>>>> s
>>>>>>> s
>>>>>>> orImpl
>>>>>>> .java:43)
>>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithAr
>>>>>>> r
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> y
>>>>>>> (
>>>>>>> R
>>>>>>> eflect
>>>>>>> ionUtils.java:189)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.in
>>>>>>> v
>>>>>>> o
>>>>>>> k
>>>>>>> e
>>>>>>> (
>>>>>>> Provid
>>>>>>> erFactory.java:165)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(P
>>>>>>> r
>>>>>>> o
>>>>>>> v
>>>>>>> i
>>>>>>> d
>>>>>>> erFact
>>>>>>> ory.java:85)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(
>>>>>>> F
>>>>>>> o
>>>>>>> r
>>>>>>> k
>>>>>>> e
>>>>>>> dBoote
>>>>>>> r.java:103)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:
>>>>>>> 7
>>>>>>> 4)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Message d'origine-----
>>>>>>> De : Olivier Lamy [mailto:ol...@apache.org] Envoyé : lundi 27
>>>>>>> février
>>>>>>> 2012 18:08 À : dev@archiva.apache.org Objet : Re: Random unit
>>>>>>> test fail during build
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2012/2/27 Eric Barboni <barb...@irit.fr>:
>>>>>>>> Hi archiva dev team,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I tried to build archiva to see how the new UI looks and also
>>>>>>>> be able to give better feedback on an issue I have with metadata
>>>>>>>> (already
>>>>>>> reported).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I follow the steps here
>>>>>>>> http://archiva.apache.org/developers/building.html
>>>>>>>> step 1 and 2 works fine.
>>>>>>> Oups my bad is not up2date :-) (I will fix that) Follow
>>>>>>> instruction from README.txt file.
>>>>>>> to run the new ui: mvn tomcat7:run -pl :archiva-webapp-js -Pjs
>>>>>>> -am -Pdev then hit http://localhost:9091/archiva/index.html
>>>>>>> (optionally force en with ?request_lang=en as other i18n are not
>>>>>>> here)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Those tests always failed ? (weird as I don't see failure on ASF
>>>>> Jenkins).
>>>>>>> Can you give more output with -Dsurefire.useFile=false
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Merci :-)
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Olivier Lamy
>>>>>>> Talend: http://coders.talend.com
>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But while trying to build step 3 unit test fail in two ways [1]
>>>>>>>> and [2] (output).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would be happy to help archiva. I have some hci background
>>>>>>>> and web design skill (not logo or image design).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Eric Barboni
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1]---
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In Archiva Base :: Repository Interface Layer
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> ------
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Test set:
>>>>>>>> org.apache.archiva.repository.metadata.MetadataToolsTest
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> ------
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tests run: 21, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
>>>>>>>> 3.076 sec <<< FAILURE!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> testGatherSnapshotVersionsA(org.apache.archiva.repository.metadata.
>>>>>>>> M
>>>>>>>> e
>>>>>>>> t
>>>>>>>> adataT
>>>>>>>> oolsTest) Time elapsed: 0.029 sec <<< FAILURE!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> java.lang.AssertionError: Assert Snapshot Versions: length/size
>>>>>>>> expected:<8> but was:<9>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [2]---
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In Archiva Base :: Policies
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> ------
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Test set: org.apache.archiva.policies.CachedFailuresPolicyTest
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> ------
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
>>>>>>>> 0.934 sec <<< FAILURE!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> testPolicyYesNotInCache(org.apache.archiva.policies.CachedFailur
>>>>>>>> e
>>>>>>>> s
>>>>>>>> P
>>>>>>>> o
>>>>>>>> l
>>>>>>>> i
>>>>>>>> cyTest
>>>>>>>> ) Time elapsed: 0.005 sec <<< ERROR!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> org.apache.archiva.policies.PolicyViolationException: NO to
>>>>>>>> fetch, check-failures detected previous failure on url:
>>>>>>>> http://a.bad.hostname.maven.org/path/to/resource.txt
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>> org.apache.archiva.policies.CachedFailuresPolicy.applyPolicy(Cac
>>>>>>>> h
>>>>>>>> e
>>>>>>>> d
>>>>>>>> F
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>> i
>>>>>>>> luresP
>>>>>>>> olicy.java:95)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Olivier Lamy
>>>>>> Talend: http://coders.talend.com
>>>>>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Olivier Lamy
>>>>> Talend: http://coders.talend.com
>>>>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Olivier Lamy
>>>> Talend: http://coders.talend.com
>>>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Olivier Lamy
>>> Talend: http://coders.talend.com
>>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Olivier Lamy
>> Talend: http://coders.talend.com
>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Olivier Lamy
> Talend: http://coders.talend.com
> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>
--
Olivier Lamy
Talend: http://coders.talend.com
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
