+1 On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 8:31 PM, Blake Eggleston <beggles...@apple.com> wrote:
> +1 > > On 4/4/18, 5:48 PM, "Jeff Jirsa" <jji...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Earlier than I’d have personally picked, but I’m +1 too > > > > -- > Jeff Jirsa > > > > On Apr 4, 2018, at 5:06 PM, Nate McCall <zznat...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Top-posting as I think this summary is on point - thanks, Scott! (And > > great to have you back, btw). > > > > It feels to me like we are coalescing on two points: > > 1. June 1 as a freeze for alpha > > 2. "Stable" is the new "Exciting" (and the testing and dogfooding > > implied by such before a GA) > > > > How do folks feel about the above points? > > > > > >> Re-raising a point made earlier in the thread by Jeff and affirmed > by Josh: > >> > >> ––– > >> Jeff: > >>>> A hard date for a feature freeze makes sense, a hard date for a > release > >>>> does not. > >> > >> Josh: > >>> Strongly agree. We should also collectively define what "Done" > looks like > >>> post freeze so we don't end up in bike-shedding hell like we have > in the > >>> past. > >> ––– > >> > >> Another way of saying this: ensuring that the 4.0 release is of > high quality is more important than cutting the release on a specific date. > >> > >> If we adopt Sylvain's suggestion of freezing features on a "feature > complete" date (modulo a "definition of done" as Josh suggested), that will > help us align toward the polish, performance work, and dog-fooding needed > to feel great about shipping 4.0. It's a good time to start thinking about > the approaches to testing, profiling, and dog-fooding various contributors > will want to take on before release. > >> > >> I love how Ben put it: > >> > >>> An "exciting" 4.0 release to me is one that is stable and usable > >>> with no perf regressions on day 1 and includes some of the big > >>> internal changes mentioned previously. > >>> > >>> This will set the community up well for some awesome and exciting > >>> stuff that will still be in the pipeline if it doesn't make it to > 4.0. > >> > >> That sounds great to me, too. > >> > >> – Scott > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > --------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org > >
