I would personally prefer the community to officially recommend skipping 3.11
to users that have not yet upgraded, as 3.0 and 4.0 have each had much more
attention given to them over the past several years. This would naturally lead
to fewer issues filed for 3.0->3.11 and 3.11->4.0, as fewer users take this
upgrade path.
Perhaps if others want to explicitly encourage the 3.0->3.11->4.0 upgrade path,
we can split our resources accordingly?
On 09/10/2020, 07:49, "Mick Semb Wever" <m...@apache.org> wrote:
Anyone have an opinion here or any formal prior art for us to build on?
>
Maybe this question should be more phrased as to which upgrade paths each
individual has time in helping and fixing users out?
If you are voting for official support for the 3.0 upgrade path then that
should imply you are putting up your hand in helping
provide that official support in the community. (Whatever officially
supported is deemed to be)
I am only for supporting upgrades from latest 3.11. It makes life a lot
simpler for all of us, and helps focus our community time on CEPs and
otherwise maintaining our supported branches.
At The Last Pickle we have always recommended avoiding 3.0, including
upgrading from 2.2 directly to 3.11.
We (now DataStax) will continue to recommend that folk upgrade to the
latest 3.11 before upgrading to 4.0.
regards,
Mick
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
