As long as those two are checked to be test issues and we agree to fix them
before next release, I am also +1

On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 at 9:42, Josh McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2022, at 6:49 AM, Aleksey Yeshchenko wrote:
>
> +1
>
> > On 3 Oct 2022, at 06:27, Berenguer Blasi <berenguerbl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On 30/9/22 16:20, Brandon Williams wrote:
> >> I'm +1 under these conditions as well.
> >>
> >> Kind Regards,
> >> Brandon
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 3:34 PM Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed). Everyone who
> has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members are
> considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least three binding +1s
> and no -1's.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> So long as the ongoing 'release criteria' thread permits, I'm +1
> >>> (I won't close the vote until that thread summarises, up to you Josh
> when.)
> >>>
> >>> I'm ok with waivers on the two new flakies 17927 and 17928, so long as
> they block the next (beta or rc) release. Both appear to be only test
> related.
> >>>
> >>> Checked
> >>> - signing correct
> >>> - checksums are correct
> >>> - source artefact builds
> >>> - binary artefact runs
> >>> - debian package runs
> >>> - redhat package runs
> >>>
> >>>
>
>
>

Reply via email to