... namespaces: .... packages: ... classnames: ... xconf: ... What do you think?
Quite frankly, I think changing implementation-specific names (packages, classes) is not worth the hassle.
I'd change just the namespaces maybe, assuming they *might* be used for another implementation besides woody in the future, the block name and mostly the documentation.
I don't mind keeping woody as the technical name in some places, IMHO the name change disruption is not worth it.
...I don't do the whole transformation at once because I know that I don't have enough time. So I hope that some others jump in <hint/> ;-)...
And that's a big problem, the risk of having a half-finished renaming is big if we aim too high.
-Bertrand
