Giacomo Pati wrote > On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Giacomo Pati wrote: > >>> On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > >>>> So what do people think? > > If it is as easy and backward compatible as you say, sure +1 from here > I think it is - the only piece missing right now are Poolable's and the tree processor needs to be tweaked a little bit to use this new one - but that should be fairly easy as well.
Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
