Gilles, I just noticed your request to write the algorithm along the lines of the wikipedia article.
The only major difference between my code and the article on Wikipedia is that I found it necessary to move the recursive stack in into a data structure to avoid a StackOverflowException when the non polynomial curvature is concentrated in a corner of the domain of integration. Notice that the Stack objects stores a Stack of limits of integration. Cheers, Ajo. On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Ajo Fod <ajo....@gmail.com> wrote: > BTW, it is possible that I'm not using LGQ correctly. If so, please show > how to pass the tests I've added. I'd much rather use something that is > better tested than my personal code. > > -Ajo. > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Ajo Fod <ajo....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I just posted a patch on this issue. Feel free to edit as necessary to >> match your standards. There is a clear issue with LGQ. >> >> Cheers, >> Ajo. >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org>wrote: >> >>> Ted, >>> >>> >>> >>>> Did you read my other (rather more lengthy) post? Is that "jumping"? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Yes. You jumped on him rather than helped him be productive. The >>>> general >>>> message is "we have something in the works, don't bother us with your >>>> ideas". >>>> >>> >>> Then please read all the messages pertaining to those issues more >>> carefully: >>> I never wrote such a thing (neither now nor in the past). >>> I pointed to a potential problem in the usage of the CM code. >>> I pointed (several times and in details) to problems in candidate >>> contributions, >>> with arguments that go well beyond "bad formatting". >>> I pointed out how we could improve the functionality _together_ (i.e. by >>> using >>> what we have, instead of throwing it out without even trying to figure >>> out how >>> good or bad it is). >>> >>> IMHO, these were all valid suggestions to be productive in helping CM to >>> become >>> better, instead of merely larger. The former indeed requires more effort >>> than >>> the latter. >>> >>> >>> >>> Gilles >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------**------------------------------** >>> --------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>> dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apache.org<dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >>> >> >
