There are a number of dangling [VOTE] threads that seem to devolve into inconclusive discussion. Nevertheless, it would be useful for the creator of those votes to resolve them with [RESULT][VOTE] messages that account for any actual votes cast and where there were no votes.
In ASF parlance, these all seem to be procedural votes, so simple majority works (unless the Commons PMC has a well-established practice that differs) -- apart from the important effort to achieve a consensus result, where possible, by addressing possible cures for -1 votes. And, of course, only the votes by PMC members are binding, with due respect to community votes in striving for consensus as well as it can be achieved. There's a reason for this parliamentary business: arriving at clear conclusions and direction. It may be that there is no such thing for the [MATH] dilemma. It would be good to have even that clarified. - Dennis > -----Original Message----- > From: Rob Tompkins [mailto:chtom...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2016 08:56 > To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [MATH]: Current state of project? > > > > > On Aug 1, 2016, at 10:58 PM, Artem Barger <ar...@bargr.net> wrote: [ ... ] > > Is there any decision has been made? Is Math project could be > considered as > > "dead" and no more future development is going to happen? > > > > I'm still willing to contribute to the project, but I'm really concern > of > > current "frozen" state, since it feels that any submition of changes > or > > reporting bugs to the project goes directly to "/dev/null". > > > > Best regards, > > Artem Barger. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
