Might want to drop commons-date  as well. Want people to use java.time 

-------- Original message --------
From: Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> 
Date: 5/21/17  7:56 PM  (GMT-05:00) 
To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> 
Subject: [LANG] Thoughts about Lang 4.0 

Hi,

I think the time has come to start thinking about Lang 4.0. A new major release 
is a chance to clean up stuff and get rid of APIs we don’t need anymore/don’t 
want to maintain anymore. Lang has become rather large. It’s description still 
is

„Lang provides a host of helper utilities for the java.lang API […]"

When I look at Lang I see a lot of stuff which has nothing to do with the 
java.lang package. I think our aim for 4.0 should be to get back to that again. 
I like the approach we took with math. Splitting a large package down into 
smaller individual components is a good idea. So my proposal is to split out 
more new components from Lang like we did with commons-text and deprecate that 
stuff in lang. Then we can start with Lang 4.0 and remove all that stuff.

Here are some components I think we could extract from Lang:

- commons-system: a library focused on working with system properties and 
detection of the operation system, system’s architecture and Java version
- commons-concurrent: a library providing additional abstractions and 
implementations for the java.util.concurrent package
- commons-reflect: a library which helps working with reflection (where is the 
line to beanutils here?)
- commons-date: a library which helps working with the java.util.Date and 
java.util.Calendar APIs

Furthermore I’d remove the o.a.c.lang3.event package. The stuff in 
o.a.c.lang3.math could maybe find a new home in one of the commons-math 
components.

The o.a.c.lang3.builder package fits into Lang 4.0 but I’d rename it to 
o.a.c.lang4.object (if that’s possible). Further more I’d remove the Builder 
interface.

The o.a.c.lang3.mutable and o.a.c.lang3.tuple package as well as the 
o.a.c.lang3.exception package can stay as they are.

WDYT?
Benedikt

Reply via email to