I have my doubts about the module system but I am not sure why you would think 
multi-release jars will cause problems.

Ralph

> On Aug 9, 2017, at 8:28 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 1:09 AM, Jörg Schaible <
> joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com <mailto:joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com>> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Simon,
>> 
>> Simon Spero wrote:
>> 
>>> Compress HEAD is tested against the equivalent of RC. The main issues
>> were
>>> with tests; some types of mocking (especially of concrete classes) don't
>>> work. This might have been fixed by now.
>>> I believe that the latest jacoco is 9 compatible.
>>> 
>>> [The biggest problem was caused by a bug in the zip code handling a
>>> particular kind of timestamp; massive changes to the jdk implementation
>> of
>>> zip caused tests that had been passing (but shouldn't have) to fail
>>> properly.]
>>> 
>>> NOTE:
>>> 
>>> Adding a Module name manifest header asserts that the code is tested
>>> against Java 9. This is documented in the minutes of the armistice talks.
>>> 
>>> jigsaw modules are pretty useless for most of Commons (consumers pretty
>>> much have to shade dependencies). [ subliminal whisper about benefits of
>>> having correct OSGI headers]
>> 
>> OK, that means we should at least test those releases that contain a Module
>> name now and silently assume, that the other stuff is not necessarily
>> compatible. Do we have an overview, which components were released with
>> such
>> a name?
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Jörg
>> 
>> BWT: I am also not convinced by the benefits of Java 9 looking at the
>> module
>> system or the multi-version jars. I fear they will rather harm the Java
>> ecosystem.
>> 
> 
> Very sad indeed. These are all "features" that break applications left and
> right.
> 
> Gary
> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org 
>> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org 
>> <mailto:dev-h...@commons.apache.org>

Reply via email to