+1: Sigs check out, tested on macOS x86_64 and arm64, all is well.
Nice work everybody! * * * Convenience binaries for macOS are available now. NOTE: They use Erlang 25 which does JIT things that does not agree with Apple’s x86_64 emulator on arm64, so there are separate binaries for each platform. The x86_64 version WILL NOT work under arm64 macOS with Rosetta. - x86_64: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/mac/3.3.0/rc.2/x86_64/ - arm64: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/mac/3.3.0/rc.2/arm64/ I will release these as such, separately. I opted against a joint build, because that would make for a 2x size distribution and a lot of unpleasantness putting things together. The main two consumers of this are humans using a web browser who can make the right choice, and Homebrew Cask users which all us to specify separate binaries. Best Jan — > On 22. Dec 2022, at 09:10, Nick Vatamaniuc <vatam...@apache.org> wrote: > > Dear community, > > I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.3.0. > > Candidate release notes: > https://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/whatsnew/3.3.html > > Changes since RC1: > https://github.com/apache/couchdb/compare/3.3.0-RC1...3.3.0-RC2 > > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release > artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the > release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so dig > right in! (Only PMC members have binding votes, but they depend on > community feedback to gauge if an official release is ready to be > made.) > > The release artefacts we are voting on are available here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/3.3.0/rc.2/ > > There, you will find a tarball, a GPG signature, and SHA256/SHA512 checksums. > > Please follow the test procedure here: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Testing+a+Source+Release > > Please remember that "RC2" is an annotation. If the vote passes, these > artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 3.3.0. > > Please cast your votes now. > > Thanks, > -Nick
