[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12862720#action_12862720
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on FELIX-2313:
----------------------------------------
Not sure what that would mean to install a jar which is not an osgi bundle.
This must have changed in version 2.0.0.
>From this version, you have custom installers if you want to install artifacts
>that are not osgi bundles, such as wars, blueprint configuration files, etc...
If we were to bypass the check and install all jars, that would remove this
feature.
>From OSGI r4, an osgi bundle must have at least the following manifest
>entries: Bundle-ManifestVersion and Bundle-SymbolicName. Supporting OSGi r3
>bundles is not mandatory for a given framework. See section 3.5 of the OSGi
>core spec.
> fileinstall does not recognize jars if it does not have Bundle-SymbolicName
> and Bundle-Version
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FELIX-2313
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2313
> Project: Felix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: File Install
> Affects Versions: karaf-1.4.0
> Reporter: Sahoo
>
> FileInstall does not recognize jar files that have only Bundle-SymbolicName.
> I see the following code in BundleTransformer.java:
> if (m.getMainAttributes().getValue(new
> Attributes.Name("Bundle-SymbolicName")) != null
> && m.getMainAttributes().getValue(new
> Attributes.Name("Bundle-Version")) != null)
> Why is this the case? Earlier fileinstall used to be able install anything
> that's a jar file.
> Questions: Why does FileInstall care about existence of any kind of manifest
> entries? Is not every jar file technically an OSGi bundle? So, it should be
> sufficient to just have the following check:
> try {
> new JarFile(artifact).close();
> } catch(Exception e){
> }
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.