David Crossley wrote:
Brian M Dube wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
The legal-discuss@ list wants to approach each use-case
as it comes up. Perhaps we have a unique situation.
I haven't checked each license yet. I wanted to make sure the plugin
worked the way I expected before worrying about that too much. It could
use a few more eyes, but it does work.
We need to consider not only the supporting libraries,
but also any additional Forrest java source code, e.g.
a new Cocoon generator/transformer.
How do you mean? Assuming the supporting libraries are allowed, what
would be the concern with the generators given that they are original
works of Apache Forrest?
Brian
