[ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-855?page=comments#action_36712 ] 
            
Vadim Pesochinskiy commented on AMQ-855:
----------------------------------------

Well... I think there is a valid need ;-). I think that requesting not to 
create idle consumers is not valid. 

The solution that you proposed does not work for me. In my case JMS does not 
satisfy the complicated on-the-fly changing priorities that my system has. This 
is why I have to fiddle with the queues and multiple consumers, some of which 
maybe idle in certain cases. I do not see why this is not a valid requirement. 
I am willing to contribute time to solve this issue.


> Add support for prefetchSize = 0
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-855
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-855
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Broker
>    Affects Versions: 4.0, 4.0.1, 4.0.2
>         Environment: any
>            Reporter: Vadim Pesochinskiy
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 4.2
>
>
> This feature would enable to support following test case:
> 2 servers are processing 3 submitted jobs with following processing times 10 
> min, 1 min, 1 min. This sequence should finish in 10 minutes as one service 
> will pick up the 10 minutes job, meanwhile the other one should manage the 
> two 1 minute jobs. Since I cannot set prefetchSize=0, one of the 1 minute 
> jobs is sitting in prefetch buffer and the jobs are processed in 11 minutes 
> instead of 10.
> This is simplification of the real scenario where I have about 30 consumers 
> submitting jobs to 20 consumers through AMQ 4.0.1. I have following problems:
> • Messages are sitting in prefetch buffer are not available to processors, 
> which results in a lot of idle time.
> • Order of processing is random. For some reason Job # 20 is processed after 
> Job # 1500. Since senders are synchronously blocked this can result in 
> time-outs.
> • Some requests are real-time, i.e. there is a user waiting, so the system 
> cannot wait, so AMQ-850 does not fix this issue.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Reply via email to