Sounds good to me.

Thanks,
    Aaorn

On 8/9/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looks like the testing of OpenEJB is good.  I'd like to go ahead with the 
tagging and bagging of
OEJB 2.1.1.  If there are no objections I'll update branches/v2_1_1 to be 2.1.1 
and then move it to
tags.

Objections?

Reply via email to