Sounds good to me.
Thanks,
AaornOn 8/9/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looks like the testing of OpenEJB is good. I'd like to go ahead with the tagging and bagging of OEJB 2.1.1. If there are no objections I'll update branches/v2_1_1 to be 2.1.1 and then move it to tags. Objections?
