Sure. It's the same as AMQ-866. Comment added on that case. thx Steve
Hiram Chirino wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > I would be happy to apply your patch but could you open a JIRA issue at: > http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ > > And attach your patch to that so that we have it properly documented > that you want to contribute your patch to the ASF. > > Thanks! > Hiram > > On 1/10/07, rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I've found a byte-order problem sending a double from Java ActiveMQ to a >> NMS/CSharp receiver: >> >> (NMS) ActiveMQ.OpenWire.OpenWireBinaryReader has no definition for >> ReadDouble(), and by default calls the MS .NET BinaryReader.ReadDouble() >> which reads the bytes in the wrong order. Here is the fix: >> >> add a new method to OpenWireBinaryReader.cs: >> >> public override double ReadDouble() >> { >> return EndianSupport.SwitchEndian(base.ReadBytes(8)); >> } >> >> add a new method to EndianSupport.cs: >> >> public static double SwitchEndian(byte[] bytes) >> { >> //Reverse byte array >> byte[] reverse = new byte[8]; >> reverse[0] = bytes[7]; >> reverse[1] = bytes[6]; >> reverse[2] = bytes[5]; >> reverse[3] = bytes[4]; >> reverse[4] = bytes[3]; >> reverse[5] = bytes[2]; >> reverse[6] = bytes[1]; >> reverse[7] = bytes[0]; >> BinaryReader br = new BinaryReader(new >> MemoryStream(reverse)); >> return br.ReadDouble(); >> } >> >> If anyone knows a cleaner way of doing this, please let me know. >> >> thx >> /Steve >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/NMS-byte-order-for-doubles-tf2951266.html#a8253895 >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > -- > Regards, > Hiram > > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/NMS-byte-order-for-doubles-tf2951266.html#a8273932 Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
