Re: 2.0 & geronimo-qname_1.1_spec

[Jason Dillon]

FYI, we are currently including this in lib/* and 12 modules  
reference it in their poms.

I think we should remove these refs.
--jason


On Jan 11, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:

Do we need to include qname anymore?  Looks like that is part of se  
5 now...

Anyone know?

--jason