The milestone naming is fine. But whatever we do, let's do it consistently in the future too. We are establishing a precedent here.
1) stay with milestones even when we are feature complete. 2) have milestones before we are feature complete and switch to beta when we are feature complete. Any which way is fine as long as we consistently adopt the same naming convention in the future too. Cheers Prasad On 3/23/07, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 22, 2007, at 2:21 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: > I'm starting to look at the end of the month release. I wanted to > get some feedback on where everyone thinks we're at. I'm starting > to look at outstanding snapshots and the like. For the end of this > month I'd like to cut a branch on Mon / Tue. > > So the real question is do we go with a beta or a milestone? Personally, I'd say we should stick with the milestone naming. No need to introduce a new naming convention. --kevan
