No hassle. There is still work to be done here Henry. It is certainly something on the radar and we can work on GORA-89 over this week/weekend hopefully.
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ah mea culpa, I was replying the wrong thread. I was trying to reply about > the initial work you did for > GORA-89<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA-89> > =( > > My bad, still recovering from the cold. > > - Henry > > > On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < > lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Henry, >> >> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Unfortunately I am pretty much out this weekend due to cold and probably >> > for some part of this week. >> >> Hopefully you are getting better., You want to see it here in >> Scotland... pure baltic is the underestimation of 2012. >> >> > Lewis, you can continue working on this or I will take a look at this >> once >> > I get my health back. >> >> I committed GORA-193 and the tests passed on build #539 >> >> https://builds.apache.org/view/G-L/view/Gora/job/gora-trunk/539/ >> >> #540 also passed, so eventually (fingers crossed) it seems like we've >> narrowed the dependency problem down and resolved it. >> >> I've re-initiated the email notifications on the trunk build, so from >> now on we will get the outcome of the builds sent to dev@ and the >> "culprits" will also receive a notification. If these get out of hand >> again we can disable them until we get the situation sorted. >> >> I think the best thing is to monitor the builds from now on however >> hopefully things are back to normal now. >> >> All the best for now >> >> Lewis >> >> >> -- >> Lewis >> -- Lewis
