On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, Ian Holsman wrote: > > While I'm not on the "showstopper" bandwagon, I'm wondering what the > > chances are of getting some packaging issues* handled in a 2.0.32 > > before somebody destabilizes the codebase. > > I was thinking about this. seeing how noone likes the idea of retagging > the 2 files to .31. > I was going to propose that v.32 == v.31 +binbuild.sh and the assert > fix. otherwise they go in the 'README.FIRST' file > > and we just go straight to beta with that, as that is what daedalus is > running and everyseems ok with v31, and the 2 patches anyway
And the Netware fix, perhaps? That's fine with me. I was just saying if _all_ we were going to do was the assert fix, it wasn't necessary. But if we want the binbuild.sh and Netware patches in a beta as well, v32 sounds reasonable.n --Cliff -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charlottesville, VA
