William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Ruediger Pluem wrote: >> On 03/03/2007 05:47 AM, Karl Chen wrote: >> >>> present. Also other issues like noise in the log file. I've also >>> seen people complaining that "GET /" might incur the cost of >>> dynamic content generation for /. >> Hm. Just thinking loud. Can we avoid this if we replace GET / with OPTIONS /? > > OPTIONS * is the convention.
Nevermind - wouldn't toggle the per-dir section, and trip renegotiation.
