-0 I DO want the EOL, but not until after 2.4 has a couple of GAs, if only because folks might not update twice.
Issac On 11/11/2011 09:13, "Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group" wrote: > +1 > > Regards > > Rüdiger > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: William A. Rowe Jr. >> Sent: Freitag, 11. November 2011 17:49 >> To: dev@httpd.apache.org >> Subject: [VOTE] Formal deprecation of 2.0.x branch >> >> Stealing a plan executed by Colm for 1.3, I'd like to propose that >> we set a two week window following committers' return-from-ApacheCon >> to execute any backports "of general interest" and apply important >> fixes/backports to pregsub allocation and non-absolute uri parsing. >> >> On approval of this plan, I would offer to introduce the EOL notices >> (as we ultimately committed to 1.3), tag and roll 2.0.65 on Nov 26th >> and we would potentially approve and release 2.0 'final' this month. >> >> And as we did with 1.3, we would start a 12 month clock to removing >> 2.0.x pretty much in its entirety from the live httpd.apache.org site >> and /dist/ mirrors (although still available from archive.a.o/dist/). >> >> Otherwise we will be developing towards 4 releases even beyond this >> month, which seems excessive when the current stable has rendered >> the prior version obsolete six years ago, on December 1, 2005. >> >>