On Sat, 3 Mar 2012, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 03.03.2012 15:22, Eric Covener wrote:
But it would have to be clear that inclusion into trunk would not by
default mean that they would be included in the next major release.
Especially for mod_ftp, I think that it requires many more eyeballs
and a comprehensive test suite before it should be part of a stable
release. Otherewise, it would just be a source of lots of security
issues that need to be handled and would tie up resources.
Including into trunk, and with 2.4 RTC, then the above is all
assumed...
I think Stefan's legitimate concern is implicit inclusion in 2.6/3.0,
not a potential backport into 2.4.
Yes, I think that's what he meant.
IMHO that wasn't a problem lately. When we got closer to 2.4 several pieces
were removed, because they were not well tested, not well-documented or
didn't work. Determining the stuff to remove from the release wasn't a
difficult or controversial discussion. So I'd say no further hard rules on
which additions to trunk will make it into a further release are needed.
Yes, I was concerned about 2.6/3.0. But if other people think it won't be
a problem, then that's ok with me, too.
