I don't know of any issues with 308, and Julian generally knows what he is doing with regard to HTTP. In general, we should consider the IANA registry to be authoritative unless it is a known bug, which means we should support everything in
http://www.iana.org/assignments/http-status-codes/http-status-codes.xml ....Roy On Jul 11, 2012, at 5:46 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Roy, as Main Dude for compliance, any issue with getting > > <https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53292> > > into trunk (and 2.4.x)? > > On Jul 11, 2012, at 3:51 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > >> On 2012-07-11 05:09, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> Just how "supported" and "standard" is this? Chrome seems to use it >>> for something else: >>> >>> http://code.google.com/p/gears/wiki/ResumableHttpRequestsProposal >> >> I was told by Google that they are phasing this out (this may already have >> happened), and then will fix >> <http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=109012>. >> >> Not that it *is* implemented in Firefox 14, shipping next week: >> <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=714302>. >> >> Best regards, Julian >> >
