> -----Original Message----- > From: Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group > Sent: Donnerstag, 23. August 2012 09:55 > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Subject: RE: [Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:traw...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Donnerstag, 23. August 2012 03:17 > > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release > > > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:25 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. > > <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > > > Candidate binaries are available from > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ - > > > these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts > > > (x86 binary distribution and -win32-src.zip) will follow sometime > > later > > > this evening. > > > > > > Feedback and edits to the draft announcement are greatly > appreciated, > > > since we need to better position 2.2 as 'just maintenance' and we > can > > > drop some of the 'shiny new' bits of that Announcement text, given > > that > > > it is old hat now, and they should be reading the 2.4 Announce > (which > > > this document now links to). > > > > > > So, for your consideration, a vote... > > > > [+1] Release httpd 2.2.23 as GA > > > > I get this testing both 2.2.22 and 2.2.23 on Linux 64-bit: > > > > # Failed test 2 in t/security/CVE-2008-2364.t at line 19 > > # Failed test 3 in t/security/CVE-2008-2364.t at line 22 > > Hm. Which Linux? I have never seen these on Centos 64 Bit.
Perl used on Centos (5): Summary of my perl5 (revision 5 version 8 subversion 8) configuration: Regards Rüdiger