On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 12:37 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> Is anyone else disappointed in the number of regressions in 2.4.35? > > Is anyone else interested in releasing 2.4.36 promptly with no new > features or enhancements which may cause 2.4.36 to be similarly unusable? > Which backports or reversions of new code are still needed to get to that > point? > > s/2.4.36/2.4.35/; s/2.4.35/2.4.34/; Sorry, I jumped over 2.4.34 so quickly after the chunking regression that my numbering is already out of whack.
