On Tue, Aug 7, 2018, 10:55 Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > > > On Aug 7, 2018, at 11:21 AM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> > wrote: > > > Specific regressions as requested by Jim, posted on users@ and dev@ > which are showstoppers to upgrading for some; > > - Non-HTTP responses from mod_ratelimit with delayed content (cgi, proxy) > * Breaking regression for module users (from sporadic to consistent) > * Fixed by elukey and ylavic > > - SSLOCSP directives breakage > * Broke some configs due to inheritance - fixed by Jeff & Frank > > - proxy_balancer apr_escape.h dependence on APR 1.5 > * Fixed by Joe to allow APR 1.4 legacy linkage > > - lbmethod linkage > * Fatal on Win32, load ordering issue on some linux configs > * Patch does not appear yet on 2.4.x branch? > > > commit URLs please.... >
You didn't seriously expect me to rise to that bait? No, I wasn't planning to bring you a rock, especially if you planted one or more fix backports yourself. We have access to the same lists, trackers and svn history. This is a query I'm especially fond of, although not all are categorized to land here... https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi&f1=version&list_id=172637&o1=equals&order=Importance&product=Apache%20httpd-2&query_format=advanced&v1=2.4.34 It would be very helpful if everyone observing regressions ensured they land in such a query.
