On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 5:50 PM Joe Orton <jor...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Dec 2023, 16:30 Yann Ylavic, <ylavic....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> For the last-chunk, I think we need > > I think that's not necessary because in the special case eos=flush, in the > normal case flush is NULL. Actually the reordering of the tests above doesn't > make any difference either, I could have skipped that. In the first iteration > of the patch I renamed eos to "terminator" to make it more obvious.
You are right, I missed that "eos = e" and not "eos = APR_BUCKET_NEXT(e)" in this case. My noise, all good! Regards; Yann.
