On 3 October 2011 12:15, Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> wrote: > On 02.10.2011 23:17, Philippe Mouawad wrote: >> Ok, hope we can do the same. > > See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-447 > > We are not the only people, who doubt it's correct to include that class ... > > There was also a discussion some time ago in another ASF project, > because the Sun license which is cited by Doug Lea has a "no use in > nuclear facilities clause", which make it non-usable as an Open Source > license. > > It looks like we are stuck here.
Yes, apart from the binary option which brings in lots of unneeded code. > And the mentioning of the Harmony class in the above cited issue is a > red herring. Diffing it with the JDK 5 standard ConcurrentHashMap shows > little difference, so I doubt it will be much faster (though I didn't > inspect the delta in detail). I think the Harmony class was only mentioned as a means of supporting Java 1.4, not as an alternative faster implementation. >> I must say I don't understand why ConcurrentReaderHashMap is not in JDK. > > There's a discussion list for JSR166 (the concurrency stuff lead by Doug > Lea) mentioned on the JSR 166 page maintained by Doug Lea. So maybe you > can post a technical question there (what's the right class that solve > the following problem ... and doesn't have sun licensing restrictions). > > Regards, > > Rainer > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@jakarta.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@jakarta.apache.org
